Send what they said, and get back what they want.
You give it the other party's words. It tells you whether their goals conflict with yours, how serious the conflict is, and whether you agreed to it, with the evidence and a confidence score for each finding.
Two things: about you, and what they said.
About you, as much or as little as you like: what you want, your situation, and who you are. About them: what they said, whether a message, a proposal, or a full conversation. If you name them, the service can also read what they have said publicly.
The question runs one way: what does the other party want from you? You can also ask for the reverse reading, what you want from them, and it is answered separately.
Four findings, each with the evidence behind it.
Yes, no, or not enough evidence to say.
Where the conflict sits and how much of your position it touches.
Whether the conflict is part of the negotiation you entered.
A confidence score, the evidence sources, and what would raise it.
A four-step scale, based on what they said rather than how they said it.
A contractor who wants 60% up front is a deal point. A contractor who wants 60% up front, will not show the permits, and needs an answer tonight is after your freedom to act.
A hard bargain is expected. A trap is not.
Entering a negotiation means accepting some conflict, and a hard bargain is part of that. A conflict you did not agree to, one that appears outside what you agreed to discuss or is presented as a normal term, is identified as such.
Below the four findings, the detail.
The response carries dozens of specific readings: what they insist on, what they avoid answering, whether their demands are growing, how consistent their story is, and more. Each is a plain label with the sentence that supports it.
The answer says so and tells you what to ask.
A one-line message or a proposal with the price missing may not be enough to judge. When the evidence does not cover what matters, the answer is “not enough evidence,” together with the questions that would settle it, written in your terms, such as “Ask whether the deposit is refundable if the permits are not issued.” Your agent can put those questions to the other party, or to you.
If you name the counterpart and set a search depth, what they have said publicly is gathered, rated by source, and weighed into the answer.
Every conversation is judged by the same standard.
Every assessment produces the same set of findings, so a conversation today and one next quarter are judged alike and the results can be compared. Each response includes its evidence and the assessment version that produced it, so any finding can be revisited, explained, and audited later.